Connect with us

Politics

Police detained Dy CM Manish Sisodiya in attempt to reach 7RCR

Published

on

manish sisodiya wefornews

Police detained AAP MLAs accompanying Deputy CM Manish Sisodia on his way to Prime Minister’s residence near Tughlaq Road while attempting to reach 7RCR.

After the president of the Ghazipur Vegetable Market Association submitted a complaint alleging Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia intimidating the businessmen during his official visit there, accusing him of threatening the vendors.
Sisodia, in a sign of protest, marched to the residence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and to surrender himself at 7RCR.

After the complaint was filed yesterday, Sisodia, quickly turned to Twitter to stating that the Prime Minister #Narendra Modi may turn the complaint into a case of extortion, violence and molestation and use it as an excuse to arrest him. The PM’s official residence is located at 7, Race Course Road.

Earlier, Kejriwal tweeted on Sunday morning, “Complaint filed against #Manish Sisodia yesterday. Manish will go to 7, RCR today to surrender himself before PM”

Sisodiya alleged that the people who filed the complaint were indulging in illegal activities in the market, where he had gone for a surprise inspection.

Meanwhile, Section 144 imposed has been imposed at 7 RCR as Manish Sisodia & AAP MLAs head towards PM’s residence to surrender, Race Course metro station has been closed.

Wefornews

Analysis

Law catching up with Akhilesh-Mayawati as they ready for alliance

Published

on

mayawati-akhilesh

Even as Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav and Bahujan Samaj party (BSP) supremo Mayawati — sworn enemies till not long ago — are making all efforts to stitch up a united force in Uttar Pradesh against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for the 2019 general elections, the law seems to be catching up with both of them.

While the BSP supremo is on sticky ground with a recent directive of the Allahabad High Court not to spare anyone involved in a Rs 1,400 crore scam in memorials constructed under her watch, even as it sought a progress report from the Uttar Pradesh government’s Vigilance Department that is probing the matter, the SP chief is in choppy waters over a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report which indicts his previous government in a Rs 97,000 crore scam.

According to a CAG audit, the mandatory utilisation certificates of works done between 2014 and 2017, involving Rs 97,000 crore, are missing. This amount was spent on 2.5 lakh works and projects, an official privy to the matter told IANS. Most matters pertain to the social welfare, panchayati raj and education departments in which more than Rs 26,000 crore was spent, but there is no certification of the works done.

Sources in the know of the full report say that, in most matters, the CAG suspects large-scale swindling and graft. What is surprising is the fact that while utilisation certificates were not given by many departments, subsequent installments were released. More than 2.55 lakh utilisation certificates are pending, casting serious doubt on governance under the watch of then Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav.

On the other hand, four-time Chief Minister Mayawati also faces some fresh legal trouble. The Allahabad High Court this week sought a progress report from the government in the multi-crore monument scandal, which involved financial irregularities in the plethora of monuments and memorial parks built when Mayawati was in office from 2007 to 2012.

A bench of Chief Justice D.B. Bhonsle and Justice Yashwant Verma has given the state government one week to present before it the progress report in the matter in which the Lokayukta had inferred large-scale financial irregularities and corruption. The court gave these directions while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Shashikant Pandey of Mirzapur, who has cited Lokayukta N.K. Mehrotra’s 88-page report on the matter.

This could trigger big-ticket trouble for the BSP supremo as there are a lot of financial irregularities under the scanner in the construction of Ambdekar Smarak Parivartan Sthal, Manyavar Kanshiram Smarak Sthal, Eco Park, Gautambuddha Upwan, Ramabai Ambedkar grounds and Smirit Upwan in the state capital Lucknow and the Ambedkar park built in Noida, adjoining New Delhi.

Other than the evidence submitted to the Lokayukta what could trouble Mayawati in this particular matter is that two others accused — her confidantes and former Uttar Pradesh ministers Babu Singh Kushwaha and Naseemuddin Siddiqui — are now ranged against her. Siddiqui is in the Congress and Kushwaha has floated her own party. Any word from them about the complicity of “Behen-ji”, as Mayawati is referred to by her supporters, in the matter could immensely impact the political future of the 62-year-old.

A dozen legislators, more than 100 engineers and government employees, officers of the Noida Authority, Rajkiya Nirman Nigam and the Public Works Department (PWD) were made accused in the scam. Mayawati had taken personal interest in construction of these monuments, named after Dalit icons and Rs 4,500 crore was earmarked for the projects in the state budget. After the report of the Lokayukta was submitted, the then SP government led by Akhilesh Yadav had lodged an FIR in the matter in 2014.

It was alleged that the pink stone used in these monuments was supplied from Mirzapur in Uttar Pradesh though in the books it was shown as having been purchased from Rajasthan and cartage charges were falsely billed. Crores of rupees allegedly went into the pockets of politicians and engineers in this. The Lokayukta, in his report, had also pointed out that while the labour and machines used for cutting stones were all from Lucknow, the payments made were 10 times what they should have been.

The state Vigilance Department is investigatng the matter. Soon after Akhilesh Yadav stormed to power, he had vowed to bring Mayawati to book but after some time the matter went into cold storage. Today, the two bitter rivals are talking of an electoral alliance in 2019. The BJP government too in the past one-and-a-half years has done precious little in the matter.

The BJP, rattled by the coming together of the two political rivals, which led to successive defeats in parliamentary and assembly by polls, will be more than willing to play this up, say political observers. First, because the processes have been started or raised by constitutional authorities — CAG, Lokayukta and the Judiciary — and hence it cannot be accused of political vendetta; and, secondly, because this will bring to the fore once again the “unholy nexus of the Bua-Bhatija to save their skins and sins”, a BJP functionary chuckled.

What and how much of an impact these issues will have on the 2019 elections is a matter of conjecture, but certainly the two issues have the potential to mar the initial attempts by the SP-BSP to emerge as alternative to the ruling BJP.

(Mohit Dubey can be contacted at [email protected])

Continue Reading

Politics

Government’s Aadhaar Act was ‘Sarkari Adhikar Act’, says Kapil Sibal

Published

on

New Delhi, Sep 26: Welcoming the Supreme Court verdict on Aadhaar, Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal on Wednesday said that the decision to strike down the Modi governments “surveillance tool” will put an end to the government’s “abuse of power”.

Speaking on the privacy breach due to the involvement of private companies in Aadhaar scheme, he stated by striking down Section 57 of Aadhaar Act, Supreme Court put an end to mass surveillance exercise being carried out under the guise of Aadhaar by the Central Government and  the “grotesque distortion of an idea conceived by the UPA”.

“Had the government not been arrogant and allowed the democratic process to work, none of this would have happened. If they heard us back then, then crores of people’s biodata is now in private hands, could have been saved. This was not the Aadhaar Act this was ‘Sarkari Adhikar Act’, “.

“This is immeasurable harm done to the polity and democracy in the country”, he added.

He said Aadhaar can no longer be made mandatory for mobile phones and bank accounts.

The Congress leader added that an important part of the judgment was that if in future a Lok Sabha speaker declares a bill as Money Bill, then Court can review this and revert. We will approach a 7-judge bench to consider this verdict again as this is clearly not a Money Bill.

Sibal said while four judges of the Supreme Court upheld the classification of the Aadhaar Act as a money bill, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud dissented calling it a “debasement of the democratic structure” which renders the Act an “illegality”.

Justice Chandrachud has also observed that passage of bills in such a manner by the Centre is a way of undermining the role of parliament and parliamentarians, he said.

The former Union Ministere further stated that the Congress will not accept any attempt by the government to bring an amendment to the Act through the money bill route and would challenge it in court.

“However, the passage of the law violates both the fundamental right to privacy and is a gross abuse of the Money Bill route”.

The Supreme Court today upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar card with several conditions by 4:1 majority.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra ruled that Aadhaar will not be required for opening bank accounts, admissions in schools or for getting mobile phone connections.

While Justice Chandrachud said the Aadhaar Act cannot be treated as a money bill and passing it as one will be a fraud on the Constitution.

WeForNews 

Continue Reading

Election

Congress goes to Election Commission with E-tendering scam in MP

Published

on

VIVEK TANKHA

New Delhi, Sep 25 : The Congress on Tuesday alleged an e-tender scam worth Rs 30,000 crore in last four years in poll-bound Madhya Pradesh and approached the Election Commission raising concern that it could impact the assembly elections in the state.

In a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner O.P. Rawat, Congress leader Vivek Tankha alleged the people involved in the e-tender scam are close to state Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan and the ruling BJP.

In his letter to Rawat, Tankha said, “It is billed as the e-tender scam and involves large-scale manipulation of the online procurement platform of the Madhya Pradesh government to allegedly favour a select few private companies in connivance with officers.”

“E-tenders of the estimated value of more than Rs 30,000 crore had been manipulated during the last four years in the state,” it said.

“The officers who purportedly manipulated the tendering process are perceived to be very close to the ruling party and especially to the Chief Minister,” it said.

In his letter, the Congress leader said that the matter came to light after a damning report was submitted by the Principal Secretary, Manish Rastogi MD of the MP State Electronics Development Corporation exposing the rot on May 5 this year.

“Even Chief Secretary Basant Pratap Singh was shocked by the findings of the report,” it said, adding that he ordered the economic offences wing to file an FIR against the delinquents inter alia for criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery, fabrication under the Indian Penal Code and for commission of cyber crimes including hacking and manipulation of electronic records under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The Congress leader also alleged that instead of promptly acting on the directions of the Chief Secretary, the state government “slept over the said directions for one month”.

“No effort to register a case or to take action for recovery of digital equipment, including seizing of servers, computers, hard disks, laptops, pen drives etc. was either initiated or attempted, offering ample time to the delinquents to tamper with/destroy evidence,” it said.

The Congress said a preliminary enquiry was ordered only on June 21 by the EOW of the state police.

The Congress also raised the question as to why the Managing Director who blew the lid off the scam was transferred. “Why has there been no punitive action against the beneficiary companies despite an internal inquiry pointing out the names of bidders who emerged as the lowest bidder by compromising e-procurement infrastructure?” it asked.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Most Popular