Opposition slams Jaitley for hopeless budget; terms sops as lollipop | WeForNews | Latest News, Blogs Opposition slams Jaitley for hopeless budget; terms sops as lollipop – WeForNews | Latest News, Blogs
Connect with us


Opposition slams Jaitley for hopeless budget; terms sops as lollipop



opposition parties

New Delhi, February 1: While Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the Union Budget 2017 presented by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley as futuristic vision for speedy development of India, the opposition parties have rejected the budget as “disappointing” and “fruitless” for crisis ridden Indian economy.

Right from Congress to SP, BSP, JDU, RJD, Shiv Sena, TMC, AAP, each party has severely criticized Jaitley for neglecting demonetisation ridden economy, including small business and industries along with unemployment and issues of youth. Jaitley is also slammed by opposition for not revealing the black money numbers even in the budget speech and ignoring the common man’s concerns who supported by standing in bank queues for corruption free India.

Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi said the budget lacks vision, and added “we were expecting fireworks, instead got a damp squib.” He said we welcome any step to clean political funding but criticized FM for not bringing in the unemployment issues.

“The main issue facing India today is creation of jobs. How are you going to solve that problem? On that front, there was nothing. No vision, no idea and for farmers absolutely there is nothing,” Said Gandhi.

Madhya Pradesh congress unit President Arun Yadav said: “We expected special provisions for farmers, workers and youth, but nothing happened.” He blamed central government for trying to offer “lollipops” to lure people.

Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and his ally Rashtriya Janata Dal chief Lalu Prasad said Union Budget 2017-18 is “disappointing” for people, particularly the poor, farmers and youths.

Both the Janata Dal (United) President and the RJD chief pointed out that the central government has failed to provide special packages to backward states such as Bihar as promised by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the campaign for the state assembly polls in 2015.

“The budget has disappointed the people. There is nothing that could speed up growth and development in the country. It is not going to help the common people, farmers and the youths,” said Kumar.

They also raised questions pertaining demonetisation, employment, poverty, farmers and youth.

The Communist Party of India on Wednesday panned the Union Budget for being pro-corporate and said it reflected the casual approach of the Narendra Modi government in taking on the crisis-ridden economy.

“The Union budget including the railway budget contains nothing concrete for the common people but all indications that while lower income sections will be further burdened and its real patrons, the corporate houses will be given all facilities and concessions,” the party said in a statement.

It also said that Finance Minister Arun Jaitley failed to present any proposal to recover Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) that “had pushed the nationalised banks to bankruptcy due to which demonetisation strike was conducted”.

As for polical parties funding issue it said “Let us have electoral reform and bring political parties under RTI Act.”

Calling the Union Budget “controversial and clueless”, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday said it was without any roadmap for the country.

“A controversial #Budget2017 which is clueless, useless, baseless, missionless and actionless. Heartless,” Banerjee said in the first series of tweets against the document placed in the Lok Sabha by Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley earlier in the day.

Senior Janata Dal-United leader Sharad Yadav criticised the Union Budget saying it was “anti-poor and anti-farmer”.

Citing issues of farmers, unemployed youths and demonetisation he said BJP had talked about two crore jobs for the youths, Where are those jobs.

The Janata Dal-U leader emphasised that the government should have talked about the small industries and farmers in the budget, saying that they are the most affected sections of the society after demonetisation.

The Samajwadi Party termed the Budget as “hopeless” and said the measures for political funding announced in it will not help contain corruption.

“It’s a hopeless budget. It has nothing for farmers. It does not talk about jobs for the unemployed,” party leader Naresh Agarwal said.

He said the government’s suggestion for funding of political parties will not help curb corruption.

Wefornews Bureau


MPs seating in galleries, RS gets ready for monsoon session

Naidu directed the officials to submit a detailed action plan by early next week, for this purpose.




Parliament of India

New Delhi, July 3 : The Rajya Sabha Secretariat is exploring seating members of the upper house in the house’s chamber as well as the galleries in conformity with the norm of physical distancing and to enable virtual participation of other members from either the Central Hall or Balayogi Auditorium in the Parliament premises for the monsoon session.

As the Lok Sabha Secretariat came out with new rules for reconvening parliamentary panel meetings, Rajya Sabha Chairman Venkaiah Naidu on Friday too held detailed discussions on various options for conducting the proceedings of the upper house during the ensuing Monsoon Session of the Parliament. The Secretary General and other senior officials of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat were present in the hour-long discussions.

However, virtual participation is considered to be limited, in view of the capacity constraints of NIC at present to enable such virtual participation of all MPs. But, Naidu said that there is a need to scale up capacities for larger virtual Parliament in due course.

The chamber and the galleries of the Rajya Sabha can accommodate 127 members while adhering to the physical distancing norms. Sources said that all the galleries, except the media gallery, would be utilised for seating the members. Seating of media persons in the media gallery would also be in conformity with the physical distancing norm for which guidelines would be framed.

“For enabling the viewing of participation of the members from outside the chamber of the House through virtual participation, it has been felt that screens need to be arranged both within the chamber of the House and outside as required,” sources said.

But given the limited seating capacity of 127 members in the chamber and the galleries of the House, Naidu asked the officials of the Secretariat to draw up appropriate plans for seating based on the strength of various parties in the House or any other effective criteria like preparing a list of the participants in the proceedings of the House for the day who would be accommodated accordingly.

But running a Parliament session during the time of pandemic is not easy as ensuring seating alone. Issues relating to taking up Question Hour, voting in the House if required, administering oath or affirmation to the newly-elected members, detailed planning for transportation of members, effective measures for physical distancing and sanitisation among other issues were discussed.

Naidu directed the officials to submit a detailed action plan by early next week, for this purpose.

Continue Reading


Why PM did not name China, again: Chidambaram

He said that the country wants to know if Modi named China as the intruder or not while talking to Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.




P Chidambaram

New Delhi, July 3 : Former Union Minister P Chidambaram on Friday questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not naming China as an “aggressor” while speaking in Leh during the day, wondering aloud if he had done otherwise in his telephonic talks with US and Russian presidents.

“For the third time in a week, the PM did not name China as the aggressor. Why? What is the purpose of talking about an unnamed ”enemy” to the people of India and the jawans in Ladakh?” the senior Congress leader tweeted.

He said that the country wants to know if Modi named China as the intruder or not while talking to Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

The Congress leader also alleged government silence on satellite images “showing Chinese troops occupying key positions in places hitherto considered as undisputed Indian territory”.

“The PM has still not answered our questions about where the violent clashes took place on June 15 between Chinese and Indian troops and if the Chinese have intruded Indian territory at several points,” the former Union minister said.

Amid ongoing tension at borders with China in eastern Ladakh, Modi paid a visit to Leh and forward locations this morning to review the security situation on the ground.

Continue Reading


Ahmed Patel asks ED, who in Gujarat Govt gave benefits to Sandesara

This is the third time the ED questioned Patel under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Earlier he was first questioned on June 27 and then on June 30.



Ahmed Patel

New Delhi, July 3 : After being grilled thrice in a week by the Enforcement Directorate personnel over alleged links with the Sandesara group, promoters of Sterling Biotech, the Congress treasurer has hit back at the agency.

Patel in a tweet said, “Thank you officials of Director ED for coming to my house thrice.”

He added that “I answered each of their 128 questions but they failed to answer my one fundamental question.”

He posed a query to the probe agency and asked “Who in the Gujarat state govt was responsible for bestowing multiple benefits, privileges and honours on the Sandesara group?”

Earlier on Thursday after hours of grilling by the Enforcement Directorate personnel on links with the fugitive Sterling Biotech promoters, Congress treasurer Ahmed Patel said the financial probe agency is working under some pressure as no proof has been found against him despite answering 128 questions.

This is the third time the ED questioned Patel under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Earlier he was first questioned on June 27 and then on June 30.

“I was asked 128 questions based on allegations but yet no proof was found against me. The agency was satisfied by my replies but the questioning is a result of political vendetta. I don”t know under whose pressure they are working,” Patel told mediapersons.

Patel said he is ready to answer more questions.

While the Congress has also defended the party treasurer, party spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said on Thursday that the BJP is not able to digest the defeat it suffered in 2017 at the hands of Patel.

Frustration and political vendetta is writ large. It is a traceable direct link from the Prime Minister and the Home Minister and the Gujarat connection to the Congress and Ahmed Patel. It is clear that a slap in the face of illegal, reprehensible, manipulative activities in Gujarat elections has not yet been digested by the BJP national and Gujarat leadership, said Singhvi.

Continue Reading

Most Popular