Connect with us

Cities

Class 4 Telangana student killed in fight with senior

Published

on

death
Representational Image

Hyderabad, Oct 24: A Class 4 student died in a fight with a Class 10 student at a hostel in Telangana’s Khammam district, police said on Wednesday.

Nine-year-old D. Joseph was found dead with bleeding injuries on Tuesday evening at the government-run tribal welfare residential school in Khammam town, about 200 km from here.

Preliminary investigations by the police revealed that the boy died during a fight with the senior student, aged 15.

The accused allegedly hit Joseph with a trunk box on his head and other body parts, resulting in his spot death.

Since the residential school runs classes up to fourth, the accused was studying in a private school but was staying at the same premises.

Both the students said to have went around the town on a bicycle since morning.

On their return to the hostel, they had a fight over some issue. The elder one thrashed the younger severely causing him to bleed to death.

The hostel warden or any staff member was said to have not been around when the incident happened. Alerted about the body of a student lying in the hostel, the warden called the police.

The incident triggered tension in the area as the relatives of the deceased and leaders of students’ groups ransacked the premises. They demanded action against the hostel warden for his negligence and justice for the deceased’s family.

Police shifted Joseph’s body for autopsy and launched an investigation.

IANS

Cities

My phone is being tapped: Mamata

Published

on

Kolkata, Feb 18 (IANS) West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Monday said that her phone is being tapped by Central agencies.

While reacting to the terror attack on the CRPF convoy in South Kashmir’s Pulwama district, the Trinamool Congress chief levelled the charge of phone tapping against the Narendra Modi-led Central government.

“The Government had inputs from intelligence agencies on February 8 that such attacks might happen before elections. Why no action was taken? Why was the convoy of 78 vehicles allowed?…I also have intelligence reports that my phone is always tapped, as you all know,” she said.

Mamata also accused several Hindutva organisations including the RSS of hatching a conspiracy in the wake of the Pulwama attack to create divisions in the country, including in her state.

“In Hooghly’s Srerampore, they intervened in a community celebration. RSS workers are outsiders and they do not belong to Bengal. They are creating a riot like situation between Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Christians.

Banerjee said it’s a ploy to spread communal violence.

“It is a gameplan to spread communal violence. No one should fall in this trap. I have also heard that the RSS are forcing people to wear burqa and pose as child lifters.

“Rumours are being spread and some incidents have taken place in Kolkata as well. This is being done by the RSS, the BJP and the VHP, they only spread violence.”

Continue Reading

Cities

Akalis-BJP want privilege motion, sedition case against Sidhu

Published

on

Navjot Singh Sidhu

Chandigarh, Feb 18 (IANS) Upping the ante against Punjab minister Navjot Singh Sidhu, the Akali Dal and the BJP on Monday urged the Assembly Speaker to initiate a privilege motion against him for his comments in the aftermath of the Pulwama terror attack.

In a letter to Speaker Rana K.P. Singh, the Shiromani Akali Dal and Bharatiya Janata Party legislators said that Sidhu’s statements defending Pakistan after the killing of 49 Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) troopers in the Pulwama attack on February 14 was a breach of privilege of a unanimous resolution moved by the Assembly in this regard.

“Navjot Sidhu spoke against the very essence of the resolution passed by the Vidhan Sabha on the same day by giving a clean chit to the Pakistan government. This was not a one off event. Mr Sidhu has continued to defend the Pakistan establishment and has now even become the voice of Pakistan’s ISI agency worldwide.

“This, as per rules, is a gross breach of privilege of the august House and you, Speaker Sahib, as its custodian, must initiate privilege proceedings against Mr Navjot Sidhu immediately,” the letter said.

The Assembly saw acrimonious scenes between Sidhu and SAD leader Bikram Singh Majithia. Both leaders exchanged barbs, called each other names and gestured angrily while being just 2-3 feet feet away as the SAD-BJP legislators demanded action against Sidhu for his “insensitive” comments after the Pulwama attack.

“The SAD-BJP members initiated corrective action because of the grave nature of the act which was bringing disrepute to the Vidhan Sabha and on all its members by their very association with it. It was decided to table a resolution today urging the centre to declare Pakistan a terrorist state and the need to take the strictest possible action against the Pakistan government and its terror machine,” the letter stated.

Talking to media here, five-time Chief Minister and SAD patron Parkash Singh Badal demanded that a sedition case be registered against Sidhu for his comments.

Badal also sought Sidhu’s expulsion from the Punjab cabinet for giving a clean chit to Pakistan and its intelligence agencies in the Pulwana terror attack case.

“Navjot Sidhu had committed an anti-national act by stating Pakistan could not be held responsible for the act of terror despite the Pakistan government’s open patronage and support to the Jaish-e-Mohammad outfit which has claimed responsibility for the same. A sedition case should be registered against him and he should be proceeded against immediately,” he demanded.

Badal said it was strange that while Congress President Rahul Gandhi had condemned Pakistan, his party’s minister in Punjab was defending Pakistan’s terrorist acts on Indian soil.

“The Congress party should make an example of Sidhu or so that in future no elected representative can ever indulge in any act which comprises the security of the nation and disrespects our armed forces personnel,” he added.

Majithia said the entire country was one in grief after the Pulwana attack but Sidhu was speaking differently.

Continue Reading

Cities

HC rejects plea challenging arrest of student leader in sedition case

Published

on

Veewon Thokchom

New Delhi, Feb 18 (IANS) The Delhi High Court on Monday rejected a plea challenging arrest and transit remand of Veewon Thokchom, advisor to the Manipur Students’ Association Delhi (MSAD), in connection with a sedition case.

The case was lodged against Thokchom for his comments on the Citizenship Bill on social media.

Justice Sunil Gaur said prima facie it appears the act committed by the accused was an attempt to spread hatred and create disaffection towards the government established by the law.

“Finding no infirmity in the impugned order, this petition and application are accordingly dismissed, while not commenting on the merit of the case,” the court ruled.

Thokchom, arrested in Delhi on February 15, had filed the petition through his brother challenging arrest and transit remand. He was arrested by a joint team of Delhi Police and Manipur Police.

The court granted the transit remand and allowed Manipur Police to take him and present him before a court concerned by February 19.

According to the police, as Thokchom’s messages on social media incited people, an FIR was registered against him under sedition charges.

The police said, “One message said ‘the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016 will be passed and in such a situation people of Manipur may seek self-determination.’ Thokchom also referred to the incident of ‘June 18, 2001 when the Manipur Assembly complex was burned.'”

He is the second person from Manipur to be arrested on sedition charges in recent times.

Few months ago, Kishore Chandra, a news anchor with a local channel, was arrested for speaking out against a government function to mark the birth anniversary of Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi, saying she had nothing to do with Manipur.

Though a district and sessions court ordered his release, the Manipur government rearrested him from the court complex and detained him for one-year under the National Security Act.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Most Popular