Connect with us

Blog

Chandigarh stalking: BJP adopting double standards in investigations to shield Haryana chief

Published

on

Subhash Barala

In a high profile case of stalking, where Haryana cadre IAS officer’s daughter has complained in writing regarding an attempt to kidnap her by the son (Vikas Barala) of a powerful Haryana politician BJP chief Subhash Barala but the police SHO incorporated routine charges of stalking and the persons were released on bail is a serious case of police authorities of tempering with evidence and justice.

Within hours Vikas Barala was released after arrest on the charges of stalking and harassing the IAS officer’s daughter in Chandigarh.

She even narrated her agony saying that she was chased for seven kilometres and the persons blocked her way repeatedly  and even tried to forcibly open the doors of her car in the middle of the night apparently to  kidnap, molest and even rape her is enough evidence to build a strong non-bailable case.

Police appears to be under immense political pressure that police authorities lodged an FIR against the accused charging them under sections 354D(stalking) and 341IPC (wrongful restraint) and section 185 of the Motor vehicle act diluting the charges against the son of a BJP politician so that the accused could walk out on bail, instead they should have booked the accused under the attempt to Kidnap (365 and 511) of the IPC.

But the debate now shifts to the argument that BJP chief who is the father of the accused Vikas Barala, who has been named in the FIR should be removed from the post of Haryana BJP chief as he can influence the case.

The Congress accused the Union Home Ministry and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of covering up the stalking incident by controlling the Chandigarh administration and the police.

Congress leader Randeep Surjewala said “Initially Investigative officer Satish Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) East Chandigarh, himself has said in a press conference that this is a case of kidnapping and outraging the modesty of a woman. He also said that these offences are non-bailable. This meeting took place at 2:30 pm. But at 5 pm there was another press conference meet by Kumar, and there he termed the matter as stalking and wrongful restrain.”

Moreover, all the CCTV cameras footage of the surveillance cameras installed along the roads on which a woman was allegedly stalked by Haryana BJP chief Subhash Barala’s son Vikas and his friend has been found to be missing which puts a  question mark on the police working and giving rise to speculations that the police was diluting the case apparently to save the guilty.

Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar assured Vikas will be punished once found guilty.

“I have complete faith on the Chandigarh Police. Justice will prevail. The accused will be punished once found guilty. This is my official stand on this matter. This case has nothing to do with Subhash Barala. Such act is highly condemnable if proved correct,” the Chief Minister told the media.

It is pertinent to mention that in the Jesicca Lal murder case, Sushma Swaraj and other BJP leaders demanded the removal of Venod Sharma (having a 40 year long political career in Congress), who resigned as state power minister after his son  was accused in the murder case.

The BJP is adopting double standards when they got Manu’s father resigned on the accusations of murder by his son but is not prepared to adopt that approach when their own leaders are involved in similar case.

It is significant to note that Narendra Modi then chief minister of Gujarat and his close confidant Amit Shah had been accused of misusing their powers and police machinery for illegal surveillance of a woman in 2009.

The tapped conversations that purportedly took place  between August and September  2009  do not mention Modi (then Gujarat Chief Minister), the websites  said that “listening to the conversations leaves no doubt that the people involved in the operation knew the ‘saheb’, at whose behest the alleged snooping was being carried out.

arti bali

By : Arti Bali

Senior Journalist

Analysis

India’s growing rich-poor divide: Richest 1% gross 73% wealth in 2017

Published

on

wefornews-post-image

India’s richest, just 1 per cent of its 1.3 billion people, grossed 73 per cent of the wealth generated in 2017 while the wealth of the poorest half of Indians — some 67 crore — rose by only one per cent, according to a report by Oxfam.

The report, launched on Monday ahead of the gathering of some of the world’s richest at the World Economic Forum here, said the wealth of India’s elite went up last year by Rs 20,913 billion — an amount equivalent to the government’s total budget in 2017-18.

The Davos event is being attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Oxfam India has urged him to ensure that the “economy works for everyone and not just the fortunate few” in line with the government’s ‘sabka saath, sabka vikas’ slogan.

“It is alarming that the benefits of economic growth in India continue to concentrate in fewer hands. The billionaire boom is not a sign of a thriving economy but a symptom of a failing economic system,” said Nisha Agrawal, CEO of Oxfam India.

“Those working hard, growing food for the country, building infrastructure, working in factories are struggling to fund their child’s education, buy medicines for family members and manage two meals a day. The growing divide undermines democracy and promotes corruption and cronyism.”

The report, ‘Reward Work, Not Wealth’, has also found that India’s top 10 per cent of population have 73 per cent of the total wealth in the country.

“Indian billionaires’ wealth increased by Rs 4,891 billion – from Rs 15,778 billion to over Rs 20,676 billion,” it said, adding the amount of Rs 4,891 billion was sufficient to finance 85 per cent of the budget on health and education in all Indian states.

It said India added 17 new billionaires last year, raising the number to 101. But 37 per cent of the these billionaires inherited the wealth from their families.

It said 51 billionaires out of the total 101 were aged 65 or above.

“If we assume that in the next 20 years, at least Rs 10,544 billion will be passed on to the inheritors and on that if 30 per cent inheritance tax is imposed, the government can earn at least Rs 3,176 billion.”

This will be sufficient to finance six crucial services — medical and public health, family welfare, water and sanitation, housing, urban development and labour and labour welfare in the country.

The report said at least one in every two workers in the garment sector in India were paid below the minimum wage. By those standards, the report said, “it will take 941 years for a minimum wage worker in rural India to earn what the top paid executive at a leading Indian garment firm earns in a year”.

Oxfam called upon the government to promote “inclusive growth by ensuring that the income of the bottom 40 per cent of the population grows faster than of the top 10 per cent” to close the income gap.

“This can be done by encouraging labour-intensive sectors that will create more jobs; investing in agriculture; and effectively implementing the social protection schemes that exist.”

It said the government must also seal the leaking wealth bucket by taking stringent measures against tax evasion and avoidance.

The income gap can also be reduced by “taxing the super-rich by re-introducing inheritance tax, increasing wealth tax, reducing and eventually do away with corporate tax breaks and creating a more equal opportunity country by increasing public expenditure on health and education”, it said.

The charity said the government must also bring data transparency, produce and make available high quality data on income and wealth and regularly monitor the measures it takes to tackle the issue of rising inequality.

Continue Reading

Blog

Delhi Assembly to get a dose of patriotism on Republic Day

“We have not talked anything about money. If they give us something, we will take it. We do not do it for money,” “We just want people to remember the martyrs.”

Published

on

Delhi Legislative Assembly

On a January afternoon, O.P. Sharma, 62, and two others were busy nailing a framed painting of a young man with twirled moustache on a white wall, which forms one side of the long corridor that runs along the Delhi Assembly building. It was a portrait of Shaheed Bhagat Singh.

Along with Shaheed Bhagat Singh, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Tipu Sultan and Rani Chennamma are among the 70 famous freedom movement leaders and historical personalities whose portraits — one for each Delhi Assembly constituency — are set to adorn the Assembly walls. These will be inaugurated on January 26.

Each portrait, one-and-a-half feet wide and two-and-a-half feet long and framed in black, are of martyrs who fought for the country from 1760 to 1947.

Guru Darshan Singh Binkal, the artist behind the paintings, told IANS that for the past 27 years he has been painting portraits of martyrs for one reason: “Martyrs should live on.

“I have been painting many martyrs who are unknown to most people,” said the 52-year-old, who uses oil colours and canvas as his medium.

Binkal said he takes around three days to complete one portrait, but he does not take money for it, except for what is needed to buy colours and canvas.

“I do other work to earn a living,” said Binkal, who has been painting since his school days.

Sharma and Binkal belong to the Shaheed Smriti Chetna Samiti, an organisation working to spread awareness about martyrs who gave their lives for the country’s freedom.

“We have only one goal — to instil patriotism in the minds of people,” Prem Kumar Shukla, General Secretary of the organisation, told IANS.

At a corner of SSCS’ office, about 30 km from the Assembly and up a narrow staircase, was a metre-long metal box.

One of the helpers opened the box to reveal dozens of other paintings, many of which were of lesser-known freedom fighters.

“People are forgetting the freedom fighters and their sacrifice. They only know the fake heroes,” Shukla said.

He said that children should know about them so that they will be “inspired to do something like that for the nation”.

The organisation, started by retired schoolteacher Ravi Chandra Gupta in 1997, conducts exhibitions of paintings of martyrs across the country.

“Even the Indian government does not have as much data as we have on martyrs,” Shukla said.

He said that through exhibitions and other means, they have reached about 10 million people across the country.

At the Assembly, Sharma and others were busy with their work again: Under each portrait, a short biography of the martyr was being nailed to the wall.

“We have not talked anything about money. If they give us something, we will take it. We do not do it for money,” Sharma said about their work at the Assembly. “We just want people to remember the martyrs.”

By : Nikhil M. Babu

(Nikhil M. Babu can be reached at [email protected] )

Continue Reading

Blog

The strange trio of Sex, Science and the State — and its consequences

Though her thesis is not brought out very exhaustively, she makes a fair enough case and that is enough to make this a must read — especially for ministers.

Published

on

Sex and Gender

An Indian minister has made himself notorious all over social media for his comments questioning Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, but can we take this to show that the two worlds — of politics and science — are exclusive or even antagonistic? Not at all, and scientific disciplines that apparently seem farthest placed from human affairs may be the most influential.

For science has done more for setting the course of nations and their governance and economy than we can suspect — beyond its part in helping develop powerful weapons or technologies.

While this alliance of politics and science is a far more recent development than we think, it owes its genesis to botany, and two 18th century natural scientists who furthered this combination, as Patricia Fara shows in this book, part of a special set chronicling key turning points in science.

And this — in the last three decades or so of the 18th century — qualifies well enough for it shows how science progressed beyond the pastime or patronage of rich, idle noblemen to become institutionalised with government support.

And as Fara, from the History and Philosophy of Science department at Cambridge University, shows it not only saw the rather incongruous trio of the “Three Ss” — sex, science and the state — coming together with so many consequences, but also brought the subject of sex out into the public discourse, though against much opposition.

It also set in train a process — in Britain initially — that would lead a few decades later to Darwin boarding HMS Beagle to make the observations that enabled him to formulate his theory of man’s origin and development — a theory which has stood the test of time despite what some misguided or willfully ignorant politicians may think.

At the heart of this development, shows Fara’s account, were two naturalists, not as famous as Issac Newton or Darwin but contributing to science’s progress at a time “science started to become established and gain prestige”.

And both of Carl Linnaeus and Joseph Banks, along with the other Enlightenment contemporaries, “fought hard to establish that scientific knowledge was valid and valuable”.

Linnaeus was a gifted but eccentric and self-propagandising Swede whose classification system for all living organism still rules today, but raised hackles of his conservative society by using sexual parts to order flowers and using human terminology for the purpose.

Banks was his British “disciple” -turned-science administrator — and no less self-propagandising — but also managed to make “science work for the state — and the state to pay for science”. A key cameo is played by that intrepid explorer, Captain James Cook.

And in telling their story, Fara ranges over small Swedish towns and the country’s unforgiving terrain, the mansions and the seats of power of Georgian England as well as its lush countryside, hazardous voyages over uncharted oceans, encounters with uninhibited, pre-industrial societies in South Pacific islands, ambition and professional jealousy, to show how the underlying root was something more heartlessly mercenary.

For, as she contends, “scientific exploration in the Age of Reason was driven by an imperialist agenda to own, to conquer and to exploit”. But apart from the above spin-offs, there were some other positive benefits too, as she brings out. Say the way, men, especially white Europeans, began to see rest of humanity and themselves in the world, or what women could be allowed to study or not — though it would still take time before all these would be tangibly realised for all.

Along with her lucid and telling discourse on the birth of modern botany with Linnaeus and Banks — almost concurrently with its economic uses, Fara also enlivens it with a colourful account of their explorations in various climes and encounters with exotic races and, above all, the contemporary public reactions to their discoveries and doings. And this could have a thing or two to teach protesters today.

Though her thesis is not brought out very exhaustively, she makes a fair enough case and that is enough to make this a must read — especially for ministers.

By : Vikas Datta

(Vikas Datta can be contacted at [email protected]

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Most Popular